Markey v. Corey
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Lillibridge, J. Assumpsit by Matthew M. Markey and Catherine Sundars against Lorenzo Corey, impleaded with George H. Waldo and Alden M. Varney, on a promissory note. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Long, J'.
Defendant Corey entered into a written contract with Waldo and Varney for the sale of certain personal property at the sum of $2,500, payable $200 the first year, $500 the second, and $600 each year thereafter, until the whole amount should be paid, according to five promissory notes executed at the same time. The contract also provided that certain stock should be deposited by the purchasers as further security for the payments. It was then provided:
“But in case said payments shall not be made as above provided, and in case either or any of said payments shall remain unpaid for the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Aniba v. YeomansMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Hatch v. BarrettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- Sears v. Lantz & BatesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
- Adams v. BlethenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1877
- Sands v. WoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1855
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Wilson v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Brooke v. StruthersMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Clark v. SkeenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
- German American Savings Bank v. HannaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Leahy v. HaworthCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.