Legal Opinion
Fellows v. Seymour
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 22, 1939PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGregg, J.
This is a motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that plaintiff’s sole remedy is against her employer under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law.
On January 24, 1939, the plaintiff was a student nurse in the City Isolation Hospital of Schenectady, N. Y. She received as compensation for services rendered by her, board, room and education. She was an employee of the city. (Matter of Nelson v. St. Francis Hospital, 249 App. Div. 910.) The defendant was employed by the city as an orderly and one of his duties was to drive the city ambulance. On the occasion in question,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Jacobson v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- O'Gorman & Young, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Matter of People (Tit. Mtge. Guar. Co.)New York Court of Appeals · 1934
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Puccio v. CarrNew York Supreme Court · 1941
- Schwartz v. Forty-Second Street, Manhattanville & St. Nicholas Avenue Railway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1940
- Crawford v. ParsonsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1956
- Wa-Wa-Yanda, Inc. v. DickersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- Fellows v. SeymourAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.