Legal Opinion
Puccio v. Carr
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 17, 1941PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeyo, J.
Mary Puccio was injured while riding as a passenger in an automobile driven by Mr. Seeman and owned by Mr. Carr, and brings this action against both of them for*the damages which *707she claims she has suffered. The defendant Carr has interposed a separate defense, alleging that at the time of the accident Miss Puccio and Mr. Carr were coemployees of a certain school district which had procured coverage for this plaintiff through workmen’s compensation, and that the injuries arose out of and in the course of the plaintiff’s employment and that the plaintiff’s exclusive remedy is under the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gochee v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Mills v. GabrielNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Mills v. GabrielAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Purdy v. McGarityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Gochee v. WagnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kowcun v. BybeeOregon Supreme Court · 1947
- Caulfield v. Elmhurst Contracting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- White v. PonozzoIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
- Yale Transport Corp. v. Yellow Truck & Coach Mfg. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1944
- Pantolo v. LaneNew York Supreme Court · 1945
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.