Legal Opinion
Elk Cty. Water Dist. v. Dep't of Forestry & Fire Prot.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 27, 1997No. A071431PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAMBDEN, J.
The Z’berg-Nejedly Forest Practice Act of 1973 (the Act or Forest Practice Act; Pub. Resources Code, § 4511 et seq. as amended; undesignated section references are to that code) generally requires submission of a timber harvest plan (THP), for review by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (department or CDF) and an opportunity for public review and input, before logging operations may be conducted. Since 1976, the THP process as implemented by regulations promulgated under the Act by the State Board of Forestry (board or BOF) has been certified as the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mangini v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Coca-Cola Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Sierra Club v. State Board of ForestryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Sierra Club v. County of SonomaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Ass'n for Protection of Environmental Values v. City of UkiahCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ross v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- County of Santa Cruz v. State Board of ForestryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- County of Santa Cruz v. State Bd. of ForestryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Board of Trustees of California State University v. Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Michelle Solobay v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.