Legal Opinion
Rubens v. Pember
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided October 27, 1969No. 22436, 22437PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Hodges.
The two captioned actions were consolidated for trial to the court without a jury and the two writs of error are deemed consolidated here. The plaintiffs in error in both will be referred to herein as plaintiffs and the defendants in error as defendants or by name.
In No. 22436, the plaintiffs, who are husband and wife, claimed that they were induced to purchase the stock of the Downtowner Restaurant in Denver by fraudulent representations made to them by the defendants. The defendants, A. M. Pember, B. Pember and Agnes Bosler, were the sellers of the stock and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Teodonno v. BachmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
- Howard v. International Trust CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
- Eberle v. HungerfordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
- Lininger v. LiningerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
- Niernberg v. GavinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- R.A. Reither Construction, Inc. v. Wheatland Rural Electric Ass'nColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
- Smith v. WeindropColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- First National Bank of Denver v. GroussmanColorado Court of Appeals · 1971
- Tekai Corp. v. Transamerica Title Ins. Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1977
- Epcon Co. v. Bar B Que Baron International Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.