Legal Opinion

Howard v. International Trust Company

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 27, 1959No. 18346PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Knauss

Plaintiff in error H. Gordon Howard was defendant in the trial court and Mary Steinhart was plaintiff in an action to compel a reconveyance of property located in the State of Illinois. Judgment was for the plaintiff and the defendant is here by writ of error seeking reversal. Subsequent to the trial of the case below, the plaintiff Mary Steinhart died and the International Trust Company, as her personal representative, was substituted as plaintiff and appears as defendant in error in this court. We will refer to the parties as they appeared in the trial court, or by name.

It is alleged in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davis v. PurselSupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
  2. Vanadium Corp. of America v. Wesco Stores Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  3. Walsmith v. HudsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hudson v. American Founders Life Ins. Co. of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
  2. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Co. v. KingColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Connell v. Sun Exploration & Production Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. People v. HowardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  5. Rubens v. PemberSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API