Legal Opinion

Smith v. Weindrop

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided March 26, 1992No. 91CA0498PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge REED.

Defendant, Lillian C. Weindrop, appeals from a judgment entered in favor of plaintiffs, Edward G. Smith and James Pitschke, in their suit to collect a deficiency upon a default under the terms of two promissory notes and a deed of trust. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand with directions.

I

Defendant’s first contention is that the trial court erred in denying her motion for judgment of dismissal after the close of all the evidence. The motion was based on the assertion that plaintiffs had failed to establish the amount of the unpaid balance due on the promissory…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burenheide v. WallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  2. Reed v. First National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1897
  3. American Nat. Bank of Denver v. First National BankColorado Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Rubens v. PemberSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  5. Rowe v. BowersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Central Florida Investments, Inc. v. Parkwest AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Ingram v. EarthmanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  3. DBA Enterprises, Inc. v. FindlayColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Co. v. KingColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Aspen Wilderness Workshop, Inc. v. Hines Highlands Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API