Teodonno v. Bachman

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Pringle.

The plaintiffs in error, Richard and Frances Ann Teodonno, were the plaintiffs in the trial court and will be referred to as such. The defendant in error, R. O. Bach-man, was the defendant below, and will be referred to as such. This action arose as a result of an alleged fraud on the part of the defendant in the sale of a residence to the plaintiffs. The trial court granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss at the end of the plaintiffs’ case, and entered judgment for the defendant. From that judgment, the plaintiffs bring writ of error here.

The defendant…