Legal Opinion

Boyette v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 7, 1979No. CR 79-24PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

Jerry Boyette was found guilty as charged of theft by receiving by the trial court sitting without a jury. He raises one point for reversal: The court should have granted appellant’s motion for a directed verdict because the information alleged that the stolen property belonged to Hawaiian Tropic while the proof at trial was that Roy Huddle owned the property. We agree.

The information alleged that on September 15, 1976, Boyette “. . . did unlawfully, feloniously, receive and retain certain stolen property having a value in excess of $100.00, such being the property of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tucker and Peacock v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  2. Von Tonglin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  2. Hosier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2000
  3. Clayborn v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  4. Clayborn v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  5. Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API