Legal Opinion

Von Tonglin v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 30, 1940No. 4178PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Appellant was convicted, upon his trial, under an indictment which charged that he had stolen “one cow, the property of Joe Randolph.” The undisputed testimony is to the effect that the cow was not the property of Joe Randolph, but was owned by Mrs. F. S. Randolph, his mother. Except only the allegation that the stolen cow was the property of Joe Randolph, there was no allegation tending to identify the offense charged. There was no testimony that Joe Randolph was in the exclusive possession of the cow or had any right to its possession. On the contrary, the testimony was to the effect that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blankenship v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  2. Merritt v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
  3. Andrews v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  4. Tucker and Peacock v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  5. Porter v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Ridgeway v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  3. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Hoover v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  5. Boyette v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API