Legal Opinion

Tucker and Peacock v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 27, 1937No. CR 4045PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMehaeey, J.

Appellants were convicted of grand larceny under a charge which alleged the ownership of the property said to have been stolen, in Bailey Jones.

The information filed by the prosecuting attorney is as follows:

“STATE OF ARKANSAS

Against

Vance Tucker, J. V.

Tucker, Neal Peacock.

SS. INFORMATION

“I, Will J. Irvin, prosecuting attorney for Drew county of the Tenth Judicial Circuit of Arkansas, upon my oath of office, in the name and by the authority of the state of Arkansas, accuse Vance Tucker, J. V. Tucker and Neal Peacock of the crime of grand larceny committed as follows, to-wit: The said Vance…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Slinkard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  2. Clayton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  3. Merritt v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
  4. Andrews v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  5. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Von Tonglin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  2. Boyette v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  3. Tate v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  4. Duncan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  5. Eason v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API