Legal Opinion

In re the Suspension of Mackay

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided April 17, 1969No. Misc. No. 60PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

BELLONI, Judge:

This matter is before the court on an Order to Show Cause why the respondent should not be suspended from the practice of law before the Federal District Court for the District of Alaska.1 By order of the Supreme Court of the State of Alaska dated February 8, 1965, respondent was suspended from practice in the state courts for a period of one year. In Re Mackay, 416 P.2d 823 (Alaska 1966). This order was subsequently stayed pending review by the Supreme Court of the United States and did not become final until September 20, 1968.

While a lawyer is admitted to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Theard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Selling v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. In the Matter of the Petition of SellingSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. In Re MacKayAlaska Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against MackayAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  2. In the Matter of Arthur Lawrence Abrams, an Attorney-At-LawCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  3. In the Matter of Arthur Lawrence Abrams, an Attorney-At-LawCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API