Legal Opinion

Rubinger v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 3, 1961PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FREDERICK van PELT BRYAN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs in these two actions, David II. Rubinger and William R. McAllister, are the assignees of Rubinger-McAllister Corporation, a New York corporation, of which they were the sole stockholders. The actions arise out of a so-called regional merchandiser’s agreement between plaintiffs’ assignor and the Cape-hart-Farnsworth Company, a division of defendant International Telephone & Telegraph Corporation (I. T. & T.) dated March 8, 1956, for marketing the Cape-hart line of radios, television sets and high fidelity phonographs in the New York…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Aschenbrenner v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. New York Telephone Co. v. Jamestown Telephone Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. Aron v. GillmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. Bushwick-Decatur Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  5. Taylor v. United States Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Randolph v. New England Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  2. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1979
  3. Alco Standard Corp. v. Schmid Bros., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  4. Matter of La Difference Restaurant, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  5. Oreman Sales, Inc. v. Matsushita Electric Corp.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API