Legal Opinion

Wood Motor Co. v. Nebel

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1951No. A-2915PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hickman

This is a suit by C. W. Nebel and son, C. W. Nebel, Jr., doing business as Nebel Motor Company, styled “Associate Dealer,” against Wood Motor Company, styled “Direct Dealer,” for damages for the alleged breach of a contract entered into between the parties of date June 30, 1944. The trial court rendered judgment in favor of respondents against petitioner for $25,000.00, and the case was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. 232 S. W. 2d 772.

The contract consisted of two instruments, both prepared by Chrysler Corporation, one being labeled “De Soto and Plymouth Motor Vehicles Associate…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. GriffinTexas Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Maddox Motor Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Bennett v. CopelandTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. Maddox Motor Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1934
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. Maddox Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Community Health Systems Professional Services Corporation v. Henry Andrew Hansen, II, M.D.Texas Supreme Court · 2017
  3. De Gonzalez v. Mission American Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Fortis Benefits v. CantuTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  5. El Paso Field Services, L.P. and Gulfterra South Texas, L.P. F/K/A El Paso South Texas, L.P. v. Mastec North America, Inc. and Mastec, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2012

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API