In Re the Marriage of Ihle
Court of Appeals of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
CADY, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal by Tamera Ihle from a decree for dissolution of her marriage to Gary Ihle. The district court granted primary physical care of the parties’ son to Gary. Tamera challenges the award of physical care on appeal and further claims she was denied due process of law when the district court imposed rigid time limitations on the length of the hearing. She claimed these limitations prevented her from presenting all of her evidence to support her claim for primary care. We affirm the district court on our de novo review.
Gary and Tamera were married in 1983. They had…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Gary McKnight Cross-Appellant v. General Motors Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- General Signal Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. MCI Telecommunications Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Albert D. Johnson v. C.F. Ashby, M.D., and J.E. Stitcher, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Henkel v. R AND BOTTLING CO.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Maloney v. BrassfieldColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- Erika L. Spitz F/K/A Erika L. Gentz v. Iowa District Court for Mitchell CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
- AC v. ACHawaii Supreme Court · 2014
- AC v. ACHawaii Supreme Court · 2014
- AC v. AC.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2014
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.