Henkel v. R AND BOTTLING CO.
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
SCHULTZ, Justice.
Plaintiffs, Richard E. and Christy M. Henkel, suing individually and on behalf of their one-year-old son (Richard, Jr.), appeal from the verdict and judgment in a products liability action against defendant, R and S Bottling Company. Plaintiffs’ claim for damages for an injury to their son — occasioned when an unopened bottle containing a carbonated beverage was broken, allegedly causing a fragment of glass to be propelled into the child’s eye — was denied. Plaintiffs assert three assignments of error. We find merit in one of them and reverse and remand for a new trial.
In…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Cronin v. J.B.E. Olson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1972
- Keener v. Dayton Electric Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- Bradford v. Bendix-Westinghouse Auto. Air Brake Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1973
- Ford Motor Company v. MatthewsMississippi Supreme Court · 1974
- Horn v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Hulme v. BarrettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
- Northrup v. Farmland Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1985
- Fogel v. Trustees of Iowa CollegeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
- Spaur v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994
- Ellsworth v. Sherne Lingerie, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.