Legal Opinion

Henkel v. R AND BOTTLING CO.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided August 25, 1982No. 65650PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHULTZ, Justice.

Plaintiffs, Richard E. and Christy M. Henkel, suing individually and on behalf of their one-year-old son (Richard, Jr.), appeal from the verdict and judgment in a products liability action against defendant, R and S Bottling Company. Plaintiffs’ claim for damages for an injury to their son — occasioned when an unopened bottle containing a carbonated beverage was broken, allegedly causing a fragment of glass to be propelled into the child’s eye — was denied. Plaintiffs assert three assignments of error. We find merit in one of them and reverse and remand for a new trial.

In…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Cronin v. J.B.E. Olson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Keener v. Dayton Electric Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  3. Bradford v. Bendix-Westinghouse Auto. Air Brake Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Ford Motor Company v. MatthewsMississippi Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Horn v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Hulme v. BarrettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  2. Northrup v. Farmland Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  3. Fogel v. Trustees of Iowa CollegeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  4. Spaur v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  5. Ellsworth v. Sherne Lingerie, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API