Legal Opinion
Maloney v. Brassfield
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided September 16, 2010No. 09CA0223PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge WEBB.
This automobile accident case, in which defendant Michael D. Brassfield admitted liability but contested causation and damages regarding plaintiff Robert "Tim" Maloney's alleged injuries, juxtaposes a trial court's discretion to conduct a so-called "clock trial" against the due process requirement that parties have adequate time to present their cases. The court set the jury trial for a maximum of seven days; ruled that trial time would be split equally between Maloney and Brassfield; tracked use of trial time with a clock; and refused all of Maloney's requests during…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Pierce v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- General Signal Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. MCI Telecommunications Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- People v. ShreckSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. HeisermanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Krutsinger v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In the matter of ARF, a minor child: JKS v. AHFWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
- People v. GwinnColorado Court of Appeals · 2018
- Makeen v. HaileyColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- Gasteazoro ex rel. Eder v. ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- In re Marriage of AragonColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.