Legal Opinion

Close, Jensen & Miller, P.C. v. Lomangino

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 26, 1999No. AC 17201PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LANDAU, J.

The defendants Frank Lomangino and Adrienne Lomangino1 appeal from the judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff, Close, Jensen and Miller, P.C. The jury rendered verdicts in favor of the plaintiff on both its complaint and on the defendants’ counterclaim. On appeal, the defendants claim that the trial court improperly (1) prohibited them from using the deposition of one of the plaintiffs former employees to impeach the testimony of the plaintiffs project manager, (2) refused to charge the jury in accordance with Secondino v. New Haven Gas Co., 147 Conn. 672, 165 A.2d 598…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Secondino v. New Haven Gas Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  2. State v. SharpeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. Santopietro v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. State v. PackardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  5. Gordon v. Indusco Management Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1973

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. WhitfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  2. Raybeck v. Danbury Orthopedic Associates, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  3. Dubreuil v. WittConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. Elliott v. StuartConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  5. Shritah v. Stop & Shop Companies, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API