Legal Opinion
Dubreuil v. Witt
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 14, 2001No. AC 18526PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*36 Opinion
DALY, J.
In this legal malpractice case, the defendants, Otto P. Witt and Witt and Associates, P.C.,1 appeal from the judgment, rendered after a trial to the court, awarding damages to the plaintiffs, Alphonse T. Dubreuil and Marilyn Dubreuil. On appeal, Witt claims that (1) the trial court improperly denied his motion for a default in which he alleged that the plaintiffs had failed to comply with requests for production and to answer interrogatories, (2) the court abused its discretion in that it violated his due process rights by precluding him from presenting a defense and by…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Gordon v. Indusco Management Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Grievance Committee v. DaceySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- New London Federal Savings Bank v. TucciaroneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Mayer v. Biafore, Florek & O'NeillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dubreuil v. WittConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- DiStefano v. MilardoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Raybeck v. Danbury Orthopedic Associates, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Mamudovski v. BIC Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. WalshConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.