Legal Opinion

State v. Packard

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 26, 1981PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmentano, J.

After a trial to the jury, the defendant, David A. Packard, was found guilty of the crimes of burglary in the second degree and of sexual assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-1021 and 53a-70,2 respee*260tively. He was found not guilty of the crime of larceny in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a~124.

The facts in this case are as follows. The victim, a twenty-four-year-old female at the time of the incident, lived alone in the second floor apartment of a house owned by her family. Her bedroom was illuminated by a night light in the adjacent…

2Cases cited80 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. State v. StepneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. State v. KurvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. State v. SharpeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. State v. AmarilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  5. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API