Elliott v. Stuart

Opinion

LANDAU, J.

In this collection action, the defendant, Mark Stuart, a dentist, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the plaintiff law firm, Robert M. Elliott, P.C. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) sustained the plaintiffs objections to certain questions posed by the defendant during cross-examination, (2) permitted evidence *335of the defendant’s income to be admitted into evidence, (3) awarded excessive attorney’s fees for the prosecution of the collection action and (4) accepted the affidavit of the plaintiffs counsel as to…