Legal Opinion · Dissent

Castro v. UNIVERSAL ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 30, 1964No. 3419Published

1DissentHood, Chief Judge

It is my opinion that ’the trial court should have vacated the default judgment for lack of proper service of process. Accepting the return of the marshal as true, it is readily seen that all it states is that service was made on defendant by leaving copies at her usual place of abode with a Mr, Singh. This is not enough. The rule requires that the copies be left -at the dwelling house or usual, place of abode “with some person of suitable age ■and discretion then residing therein.”

The marshal’s return does not state that Mr. Singh was a person of suitable age and discretion, and more…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Boll v. WeinsteinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  2. Wise v. HerzogCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  3. Carter v. CarterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  4. Chiaro v. LemberisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960
  5. Hicks v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API