Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Boll v. Weinstein

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 12, 1956No. 45253 and 45258PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGER, J.-

[64] -Each of these consolidated eases is an original proceeding in this court. The first is in prohibition and the second in mandamus; they arise out of the same facts. These facts are shown by the respective petitions and returns and the attached exhibits. The relator in each case has filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings. The question, therefore, is one of law.

Robert Boll filed suit in St. Louis County against Springlake Park, Inc., for damages for personal injuries. That defendant is a Missouri corporation having its principal office in Jefferson County, Missouri; it has…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ellis v. CreechSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  2. Robinson v. FieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  3. Mahan v. BaileSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  4. State Ex Rel. Minihan v. AronsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  5. Davison v. HoughSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. William Ranni Associates, Inc. v. HartenbachSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  2. State Ex Rel. Allen v. BarkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  3. State Ex Rel. DePaul Health Center v. MummertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  4. State Ex Rel. Douglas Toyota III, Inc. v. KeeterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  5. Crouch v. CrouchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API