Field's Estate v. Commissioner
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
In Helvering v. Hallock, 309 U.S. 106, 111, 60 S.Ct. 444, 84 L.Ed. 604, 125 A.L.R. 1368, the Court said that “the measure of the tax is the value of the transferred property at the time when death brings it into enjoyment” Precisely what that means has been a matter of much comment.1 We do not agree with the Tax Court that Smith v. Shaughnessy, 318 U.S. 176, 63 S.Ct. 545, 87 L.Ed. 690, which dealt with a gift tax, aids decision here. Whatever we might now hold if this were for us a novel question, we need not consider, for the matter is governed in this circuit by our…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Helvering v. HallockSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Smith v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Bankers Trust Co. v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. FlandersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. RothensiesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Commissioner v. Estate of FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Barnett Hollander, of the Will of Lester Field, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Estate of Field v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Barnett Hollander, of the Will of Lester Field, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.