Legal Opinion

Commissioner v. Estate of Field

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 5, 1945No. 578PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy

This is a companion case to Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. Rothensies, ante, p. 108. It too presents a question as to the proper valuation of the corpus of an inter vivos trust under § 302 (c) of the Revenue Act of 1926, 44 Stat. 9, 70.

On June 8, 1922, the decedent transferred to a trustee certain assets valued at the date of his death at the sum of $157,452.82. The material portions of the trust provided:

1. The trust was to continue for the joint lives of two nieces and the life of the survivor of them unless terminated earlier under 4, infra.

2. The income was to be paid to the decedent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Field v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1943
  2. Field's Estate v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. Trust Under the Will of Bingham v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Commissioner v. Estate of ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Estate of Spiegel v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Estate of MadisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Goldstone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API