Legal Opinion

Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. Rothensies

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 5, 1945No. 263PublishedCited by 152 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy

Our attention here is directed toward the proper valuation for federal estate tax purposes of the corpus of an inter vivos trust where the transfer was intended to take effect in possession or enjoyment at or after death and where the settlor retained a life estate in the trust income and a reversionary interest in the corpus.

On March 26, 1928, the decedent, Anna C. Stinson of Bryn Mawr, Pa., transferred certain property in trust, the value of which at the time of her death was $84,443.49. The income of the trust was to be paid to the settlor during her life and at her death to her daughters…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Helvering v. HallockSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Reinecke v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Klein v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Helvering v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. RothensiesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by152 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Estate of ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Estate of Spiegel v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Estate of MadisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Goldstone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Gaylord v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946

147 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API