Legal Opinion

Bell v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1998No. Civil 970212PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

[¶ 1] Kyle Bell appeals from an order of the Cass County District Court denying his application for default judgment and an order dismissing an amended application for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Kyle Bell was convicted of two counts of gross sexual imposition and two counts of use of a minor in sexual performance, class B felonies, and sentenced under an amended criminal judgment and commitment dated June 16, 1995. Bell appealed the conviction and sentence; both were affirmed. State v. Bell, 540 N.W.2d 599 (N.D.1995). Bell applied for post-conviction relief on…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Hatch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. State v. SlapnickaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Furgison v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  4. Mertz v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Caristo v. SullivanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Steinbach v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. BenderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. RaulstonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Heyen v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Flattum-Riemers v. Peters-RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API