Legal Opinion
State v. Raulston
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 20, 2005No. 20050159-20050161PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CROTHERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] Clyde Raulston appeals from a district court order denying post-conviction relief and an order denying his motion under Rule 35(a), N.D.R.Crim.P. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] Raulston pled guilty to interference with an emergency call and aggravated assault. Criminal judgments were entered on December 10; 2004, at which time Raulston was to begin serving a three-year prison sentence with all but 60 days suspended. Raulston was not immediately incarcerated.
[¶ 3] ' During the period before he began serving his sentence, Raulston violated several probation conditions, including…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. Juan Munoz-Dela RosaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Heckelsmiller v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. BatesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Sambursky v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Johnson v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. GrayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Sambursky v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.