Steinbach v. State
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Mark Steinbach appealed from a judgment summarily dismissing his application for post-conviction relief.1 We conclude the trial court did not err in summarily dismissing, under N.D.C.C. § 29-32.1-12, claims 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 8 in Steinbach’s post-conviction relief application, or in summarily dismissing claim 4 for ineffective assistance of counsel when Steinbach was put to his proof and failed to provide any evidentiary support for his allegations. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] In April 1997, a jury found Stein-bach guilty of murder, physical obstruction of a government…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- State v. SteinbachNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Klose v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Laib v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Vandeberg v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Ude v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Johnson v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.