Legal Opinion

Steinbach v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 2003No. 20020322PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Mark Steinbach appealed from a judgment summarily dismissing his application for post-conviction relief.1 We conclude the trial court did not err in summarily dismissing, under N.D.C.C. § 29-32.1-12, claims 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 8 in Steinbach’s post-conviction relief application, or in summarily dismissing claim 4 for ineffective assistance of counsel when Steinbach was put to his proof and failed to provide any evidentiary support for his allegations. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] In April 1997, a jury found Stein-bach guilty of murder, physical obstruction of a government…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. State v. SteinbachNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Klose v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Laib v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Vandeberg v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Ude v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Johnson v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API