Legal Opinion

United States v. Richard Murzyn, A/K/A "Mo Mo", and Russell Hall

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 30, 1980No. 79-1855, 79-1861PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUER, Circuit Judge.

In these consolidated appeals from their convictions after a joint trial on charges involving the interstate transport and sale of stolen automobiles, the defendants contend that they were by various means denied a fair trial. Specifically, defendant Richard Murzyn argues that he was deprived of a fair trial by the introduction of evidence of his past misconduct to prove his predisposition to commit the crimes charged and to negate his defenses of coercion and entrapment; by the omission of an instruction on the pertinence of the past misconduct evidence; by an erroneous…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Braverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. United States v. FalconeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. United States v. James P. HickokCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. TutinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Gambino, Rosario, Erasmo Gambino, Antonio Gambino, and Anthony SpatolaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. TutinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Alejo Maldonado MedinaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API