Legal Opinion

United States v. Gambino, Rosario, Erasmo Gambino, Antonio Gambino, and Anthony Spatola

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 23, 1986No. 84-5842, 84-5843, 84-5866, 84-5880 and 85-5396PublishedCited by 126 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

A. LEON HIGGINBOTHAM, Jr., Circuit Judge.

Appellants 1 Rosario Gambino, Erasmo Gambino, Antonio Gambino and Anthony Spatola were indicted by a federal grand jury on multiple counts of narcotics related offenses. They were convicted inter alia of conspiring to distribute heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Appellants now appeal from their judgments of conviction. Alternatively, appellants urge that their sentences be vacated and their cases remanded for resentencing. For the reasons set forth below, we will affirm the district court.

I

Pursuant to a multi-count indictment,…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by126 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GrantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. State v. PrecioseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  3. United States v. John VoigtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  4. Appel v. HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. KempCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007

121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API