Legal Opinion

Birmingham Purchasing Co. v. Colvin

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 9, 1929No. 6 Div. 121PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This is an action for rent and was commenced by attachment sued out under the provisions of article 3, chapter 318 of the Code, and section 8818, which is a part of this article, provides that: “The law governing the issue, levy, trial, and other proceedings in attachment suits in general, not inconsistent with the provisions of this article, shall govern in all cases arising under this article.” Code of 1923, § 8818. This section makes applicable the provisions oi section 6212, prescribing the procedure by which the sufficiency of the attachment affidavit may be made an issue. The last-cited…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wynn v. Tallapoosa County BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. Brown v. CoatsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  3. Drakford v. TurkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  4. Melvin v. ScowleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  5. Montgomery & Wetumpka Plank-Road Co. v. WebbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Taylor v. First National Bank of TuskaloosaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  2. Bates v. Bank of MoultonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Qualls v. Monroe County BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  4. Barnes v. BurkeCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970
  5. First Nat. Bank of Russellville v. WelchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API