Legal Opinion

Qualls v. Monroe County Bank

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 11, 1934No. 1 Div. 828PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

The action was upon a promissory note hy the payee against the administrator of the estate of the alleged maker. The issue was upon a plea of non est factum.

The note purports to be executed by Tom Fry, W. M. Fry, and A. J. Qualls, the decedent, who signed hy mark, attested by Margaret Simmons.

This witness testified to the execution of the note by decedent with her assistance as stenographer in the bank.

Defendant then offered evidence tending to show decedent .recommended the Fry negroes for credit, but did not sign the note.

Dave Qualls, a son and heir of decedent, was…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wynn v. Tallapoosa County BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. Freeman v. BlountSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Boykin v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  4. Bank of Phoenix City v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  5. Warten v. BlackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Richards v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Pfingstl v. SolomonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  3. Warner v. WarnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  4. Niehuss v. FordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  5. Schoenvogel v. Venator Group Retail, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API