Succession of Lanata
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
The primary question presented for determination in this litigation — one that is res novo in the jurisprudence of this State — is whether or not a formal judgment of interdiction ipso facto incapacitates the interdict to dispose of his property by donation mortis causa.
Two appeals bring this succession matter before us. In one of the proceedings (No. 37,248) Mrs. Emma Lanata Hermann, a sister of the decedent and testator, John Sidney Lanata, is appealing from a judgment that dismissed her suit attacking the will, the court having sustained an exception of no cause of action directed at the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Aubert v. AubertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1851
- Ducasse's Heirs v. DucasseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
- Succession of ReemsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
- Succession of ConnorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
- Succession of DahmSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
3Cited by6 opinions
- Succession of SchmidtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
- Succession of BrantleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
- Succession of Caprito v. MayhewLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
- Oncale v. ClementLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
- Succession of SaulsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.