Succession of Connor
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.
The deceased made a -will in favor of his wife. Then he became insane and was committed to an insane asylum under the provision of Act No. 253 of 1910; but he was never formally interdicted.
For a while ,his wife remained loyal to him. But afterwards she had her marriage to him annulled, and then remarried.
Thereupon he made a new will revoking his former’ will and bequeathing his estate to his legal heirs.
The only question involved is whether this later will be valid.
I
We are not prepared to hold that even a formal interdiction deprives the person interdicted ipso facto of all power to make,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Vance v. EllerbeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Oliver v. TerrallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
3Cited by7 opinions
- Succession of LambertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
- In Re BryantSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
- Succession of LanataSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
- Nash v. BowdenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
- In re BryantLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.