Legal Opinion

Succession of Connor

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 13, 1928No. 27159PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.

The deceased made a -will in favor of his wife. Then he became insane and was committed to an insane asylum under the provision of Act No. 253 of 1910; but he was never formally interdicted.

For a while ,his wife remained loyal to him. But afterwards she had her marriage to him annulled, and then remarried.

Thereupon he made a new will revoking his former’ will and bequeathing his estate to his legal heirs.

The only question involved is whether this later will be valid.

I

We are not prepared to hold that even a formal interdiction deprives the person interdicted ipso facto of all power to make,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vance v. EllerbeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  2. Oliver v. TerrallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Succession of LambertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  2. In Re BryantSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
  3. Succession of LanataSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
  4. Nash v. BowdenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
  5. In re BryantLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API