Succession of Dahm
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtBrunot, J.
The plaintiffs, alleging themselves to be the sole surviving heirs of George Dahm, deceased, are attacking the will of the deceased upon the alleged ground that at the time the will was made, and for a- number of years prior thereto, the deceased was of unsound mind, and was incapable of transacting business or managing 'his affairs. They also attack transfers of certain property of the deceased, made by him during his lifetime, and made by his vendee to other purchasers. • The suit was met by exceptions of no right or cause of action. The exceptions were sustained, and plaintiffs appealed.
Pla…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ducasse's Heirs v. DucasseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
- Carrano v. ColombelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
3Cited by5 opinions
- McGee v. FinleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953
- Butler v. AustinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
- Succession of LanataSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
- Wooley v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
- Succession of LanataSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944