Legal Opinion

Lindsey v. County of Hudson

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 28, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ackekson, S. C. C.

The complaint herein is to recover for the plaintiff a portion of his salary as a temporary clerk *628of the Hudson County Board of Elections under an appointment by that board made pursuant to an act entitled “An act to amend an act entitled cAn act to regulate elections (Revision.of 1920)/ passed May 5th, 1920,” Pamph. L. 1921, . ch. 196, § 24. It is alleged that plaintiff was appointed as aforesaid on December 15th, 1927, “and served in that capacity until the 31st day of October, 1930;” that his salary was fixed at $2,400 per year; that “on the 22d day of May, 1930, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hillel v. Borough of EdgewaterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930
  2. Van Sant v. Atlantic CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
  3. Keegle v. County of HudsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
  4. Dinkel v. County of HudsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hintenberger v. City of GarfieldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  2. Byrnes v. Boulevard CommissionersHudson County Circuit Court, N.J. · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API