Legal Opinion

Hintenberger v. City of Garfield

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 14, 1958PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

52 N.J. Super. 526 (1958)

146 A.2d 123

EDWARD HINTENBERGER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

CITY OF GARFIELD, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 14, 1958.

Decided November 14, 1958.

Before Judges PRICE, SCHETTINO and HALL.

Mr. George F. Losche argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Messrs. Losche & Losche, attorneys).

Mr. Carmen M. Belli argued the cause for defendant-respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered by SCHETTINO, J.A.D.

Appeal is from a judgment in favor of defendant in an action brought to recover back salary…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Handlon v. Town of BellevilleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  3. Taylor v. New Jersey Highway AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  4. De Marco v. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders of Bergen CountySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  5. McFeely v. Board of Pension CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Graham v. City of Asbury ParkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  2. Eliason v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  3. State v. CusickNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  4. Graham v. City of Asbury ParkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  5. Paull v. PierceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API