Legal Opinion

Byrnes v. Boulevard Commissioners

Hudson County Circuit Court, N.J.

Decided March 9, 1938PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brown, C. C. J.

The above entitled canse was tried before the court without a jury upon the pleadings and an agreed state of facts. The plaintiffs are fifty-eight in number, fifty-seven of whom were within the classified service of the Civil Service act and one, the head of the police department of the Hudson county boulevard commission, in the unclassified service as defined in that act. The suit is brought to recover salaries from the time of the alleged illegal discharge of the plaintiffs by the Hudson county park commission to the time of their reinstatement by the defendant boulevard…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. State v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
  3. Erwin v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897
  4. United States v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Allison v. CorkerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Perkins v. EskridgeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  2. Jersey City v. Dept. of Civil ServiceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  3. L.S. Village, Inc. v. Lawrence TownshipNew Jersey Superior Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API