Legal Opinion

Keegle v. County of Hudson

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 13, 1923PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The legal principles to be applied in these cases are the same and the questions raised can be disposed of in one opinion.

In the action by Keegle the facts are that he was appointed by the defendant as fire custodian at the county farm of defendant at Snake Hill, subject to “An act regulating the employment, tenure and discharge of certain officers and employes of this state, and of the various municipalities and counties thereof, and providing for a civil service commission and defining its powers and duties” (Pamph. L. 1908, p. 235), and the amendments and supplements thereto. The defendant…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. De Marco v. BD., CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, BERGEN CTY.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  2. Rozmierski v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  3. Byrnes v. Boulevard CommissionersHudson County Circuit Court, N.J. · 1938
  4. Lindsey v. County of HudsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
  5. Jorgensen v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API