Legal Opinion
Jessee v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided November 20, 2006No. 05SA370PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Eid
In this original proceeding under C.A.R. 21, Petitioner Ruth Jessee seeks to vacate a protective order entered by the district court pursuant to C.R.C.P. 26(c)(7). We issued an order to show cause why the requested relief should not be granted, and the parties have briefed the issue. Because we conclude that C.R.C.P. 26(c) does not authorize those portions of the protective order that purport to restrict the use of documents obtained outside of the discovery process in this case, we now make the rule absolute in part.
L
Petitioner Ruth Jessee was injured in an automobile accident on June 14,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Spahmer v. GulletteSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Beauprez v. AvalosSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Bridge C.A.T. Scan Associates v. Technicare Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Culinary Foods, Inc. v. Raychem Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
- Nestle Foods Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sheridan Redevelopment Agency v. Knightsbridge Land Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- G & a LAND, LLC v. City of BrightonColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- METAL MANAGEMENT WEST, INC. v. StateColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- Metzler v. BallDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2019
- Northside v. Notes LiveColorado Court of Appeals · 2024