G & a LAND, LLC v. City of Brighton
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge ROTHENBERG. *
In this action against defendant, City of Brighton, plaintiffs G & A Land, LLC, Jacob J. Dawson, and Betty L. Dawson (Landowners), appeal the trial court's judgment (1) granting Brighton's motion for summary judgment on Landowners' promissory estop-pel claim; and (2) granting Brighton's CRCP. 12(b)(5) motion to dismiss Landowners' inverse condemnation and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims. We affirm the judgment dismissing the promissory estoppel and § 1983 claims, but reverse it as to the inverse con-demmnation claim, and we remand for further proceedings on that claim.
I.…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Palazzolo v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- City of Buffalo v. J. W. Clement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Klopping v. City of WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- George v. Urban Settlement ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Glover v. InnisColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
- American Family Mutual Insurance Company v. American National Property and Casualty CompanyColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- Ruybalid IV v. Board of County Commissioners of Las Animas CountyColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
- Walshe v. ZaborsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.