Legal Opinion

G & a LAND, LLC v. City of Brighton

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 29, 2010No. 08CA2192PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge ROTHENBERG. *

In this action against defendant, City of Brighton, plaintiffs G & A Land, LLC, Jacob J. Dawson, and Betty L. Dawson (Landowners), appeal the trial court's judgment (1) granting Brighton's motion for summary judgment on Landowners' promissory estop-pel claim; and (2) granting Brighton's CRCP. 12(b)(5) motion to dismiss Landowners' inverse condemnation and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims. We affirm the judgment dismissing the promissory estoppel and § 1983 claims, but reverse it as to the inverse con-demmnation claim, and we remand for further proceedings on that claim.

I.…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Palazzolo v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. City of Buffalo v. J. W. Clement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Klopping v. City of WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. George v. Urban Settlement ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  2. Glover v. InnisColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. American Family Mutual Insurance Company v. American National Property and Casualty CompanyColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Ruybalid IV v. Board of County Commissioners of Las Animas CountyColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Walshe v. ZaborsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API