Legal Opinion
Jaramillo v. Colorado Judicial Department
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 2, 2005No. 04-1284PublishedCited by 186 opinions
1Per curiam
This Title VII appeal arises out of Plaintiff Kristin Jaramillo’s claim that the Colorado Judicial Department (“CJD”) subjected her to disparate treatment on the basis of sex when it passed her over for promotion in favor of a male officer. The district court granted the CJD’s motion for summary judgment. We exercise discretion under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and AFFIRM.
I
Ms. Jaramillo began working as a volunteer in the Denver Juvenile Probation Department (“DJPD”) in 1994. Appellant’s App. at 288. Over the next several years she continued working at DJPD in a part-time, unpaid capacity. Id. at…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by186 opinions
- Johnson v. Weld County, Colo.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Bryant v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. BCI Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Jones v. Oklahoma City Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Conroy v. VilsackCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
181 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.