Nelson v. East Side Grocery Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco granting a motion for a change of venue. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Plaintiff brought this action in the city and county of San Francisco to recover upon a contract for the sale of merchandise. In the caption of his complaint the defendant is named as “East Side Grocery Company, also known as Central Grocery Company.” The complaint in its body alleges the three certain persons—Jacobs, Mc-Meniman and Frenzi—associated themselves together for the purpose of carrying on the retail grocery business in the city of Stockton; that said business was at first transacted under the name of “East Side Grocery Company,” which was later changed to “Central…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Griffin & Skelly Co. v. Magnolia & Healdsburg Fruit Cannery Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Kendrick v. Diamond Creek Consolidated Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by10 opinions
- McClung v. WattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Pacific Bal Industries v. Northern Timber, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Bell v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Plumlee v. PoagCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Mosby v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.