Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Engelhard Industries, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 11, 1960No. Civ. No. 411-59PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEANEY, District Judge.
In January of 1936 the defendant’s predecessor, Hanovia Chemical and Manufacturing Co. (hereinafter referred to as “Hanovia”), made an agreement with a group of German inventors (hereinafter referred to as the “Spanner Group”), in which the Spanner Group granted a license to make, use and sell high pressure vapor discharge burners for ultra-violet irradiation for all purposes except illumination. In the agreement there was a further grant to Hanovia authorizing it to license and sue others in the field of ultra-violet, high pressure mercury lamps.
By the terms of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. Hanovia Chemical & Mfg. CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Frost Ry. Supply Co. v. T. H. Symington & Son, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1938
- T. H. Symington & Son, Inc. v. Symington Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1935
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Hanovia Chemical & Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1948
3Cited by1 opinion
- Robert F. Kennedy, Attorney General of the United States, as Successor to the Alien Property Custodian v. Engelhard Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961