Scott v. Moon

Prentis, P.,

delivered the opinion of the court»

Edward W. Scott, Jr., is here complaining of an adverse judgment in favor of Moon & Pitts, attorneys, *428hereinafter called the plaintiffs, for a balance claimed to be due them for fees in three cases. The plaintiffs claimed $3,450, and after a hotly contested, trial there was a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiffs for $1,800, with interest from January 23, 1923.

1. One of the defenses, stated generally, is based upon a claim that Pitts alone was employed, and that therefore the defendant owes nothing to the firm of Moon & Pitts.

It is only…