Legal Opinion

Ruhlin v. Samaan

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 4, 2011No. 101209PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

718 S.E.2d 447 (2011)

282 Va. 371

Jeffrey A. RUHLIN

v.

Mariam G. SAMAAN.

Record No. 101209.

Supreme Court of Virginia.

November 4, 2011.

John R. Newby, Richmond (Tronfeld West & Durrett, on brief), for appellant.

David W. Drash (Robey, Teumer, Drash, Kimbrell & Counts, Norfolk, on brief), for appellee.

Present: KINSER, C.J., LEMONS, GOODWYN, MILLETTE, and MIMS, JJ.

Opinion By Justice S. BERNARD GOODWYN.

In this appeal, we consider whether the circuit court erred in permitting the use of a transcript of a recorded statement to refresh a witness's recollection, and whether the circuit court erred in ruling…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Faison v. HudsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1992
  2. Harris v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1942
  3. Lawrence v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2010
  4. Anderson v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2011
  5. Gray v. RhoadsSupreme Court of Virginia · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Burns v. GagnonSupreme Court of Virginia · 2012
  2. Anderson v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2011
  3. Brandon Williams v. M. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024
  4. Doe v. Virginia Wesleyan CollegeNorfolk County Circuit Court · 2016
  5. Insley v. WalshSurry County Circuit Court · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API