Legal Opinion

Kuberski v. Haussermann

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 15, 1934PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hehee, J.

Relator, Knberski, challenges the title of defendant, Haussermann, to the office of councilman of the borough of South River, in the county of Middlesex. He was granted leave to exhibit in this court, in the name of the attorney-general, an information in the nature of a writ of quo warranio, to inquire by what warrant or authority defendant claims the office in question. There is incorporated in the state of the case a copy of a writ commanding the sheriff to summon defendant before this court, on a day specified, “to answer unto the State of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Edwards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. State ex rel. Reynolds v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Snipes v. City of WinstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  4. Young v. City of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  5. ConantSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Aldom v. Borough of RoselandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  2. Cranberry Lake Quarry Co. v. JohnsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  3. Haack v. RanieriNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  4. Grimes v. MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  5. Georgia v. SurudaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API