Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Reynolds v. Board of Commissioners

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1874PublishedCited by 37 opinions

From the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, J.

This was an application by the appellant for a .writ of mandate against the appellees, to compel them to-make an order granting to the appellant a permit to sell intoxicating liquors under the act of February 27th, 1873, Acts 1873, p. 151. The affidavit or petition on which the writ was asked sets forth the various steps which had been taken by the appellant in alleged conformity to the statute, the-making of the application to the board to grant the permit, and their refusal. The commissioners having been required to sign a bill of exceptions containing the evidence, and. having refused to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Flournoy v. City of JeffersonvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Waldo v. WallaceIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Noyes & Pettingill v. HewittNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  4. Betts v. DimonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1819
  5. Board of Commissioners v. HicksIndiana Supreme Court · 1851

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Grusenmeyer v. City of LogansportIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. State Ex Rel. Felthoff v. RichardsIndiana Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Knutson v. State Ex Rel. SebergerIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
  4. State v. Board of Public WorksSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1894
  5. Excelsior Mutual Aid Ass'n v. RiddleIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API