Legal Opinion

Haack v. Ranieri

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 20, 1964PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

83 N.J. Super. 526 (1964)

200 A.2d 522

LORETTA HAACK, PLAINTIFF,

v.

RUDOLPH RANIERI, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided April 20, 1964.

Mr. John J. Sheehy argued the cause for plaintiff (Messrs. Rooney, Peduto & Sheehy, attorneys for plaintiff).

Mr. Nicholas S. Schloeder argued the cause for defendant.

ARTASERSE, A.J.S.C.

This is a proceeding in lieu of prerogative writs instituted by plaintiff Loretta Haack seeking to oust defendant Rudolph Ranieri as councilman from the first ward of the City of Hoboken and to be granted said office herself for the reasons hereinafter set…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Arant v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Schack v. TrimbleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  3. Saunders v. HaynesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  4. State v. BennySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  5. Monte v. MilatNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Brunetti v. Borough of New MilfordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  2. Williams v. Clark County District AttorneyNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Alongi v. SchatzmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  4. E. Rutherford Industrial Park v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
  5. In Re Keogh-DwyerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API